I was a linguistics major at Dartmouth College, and am now pursuing a doctoral degree in Speech ‘ Hearing Biosceince ‘ Technology (SHBT) at the Harvard-MIT Joint Division of Health Sciences and technology
ASL is not a visual version of English. It is a fully expressive and grammatical language in its own right, with no more connection to English than German or Chinese. The linguistics world at large subscribes to this view, as evidenced by the existence of professional academic journals devoted to studying signed languages
ASL is not an Anglo-Saxon language, and it is not a language without a culture – Deaf culture (with a capital ‘D’!!) is as rich as any other. For centuries deafness was seen only as a pathology, and attempts by deaf people to communicate via signed language was despised. The Deaf culture was viewed as a threat to the well-being of deaf individuals, as was their language. How could such things threaten their well-being? It was thought that Deaf language and culture were imperfect fall-backs that would hinder deaf people’s attempts to survive in a near-normal way in a hearing world. Only relatively recently has this view begun to change, and it is still unfortunately a view held by many.
I highly recommend Oliver Sacks’ book “Seeing Voices”
Sincerely,
Steven Lulich
This is an account occasionally used by the Daily Free Press editors to post archived posts from previous iterations of the site or otherwise for special circumstance publications. See authorship info on the byline at the top of the page.