Field Hockey, NCAA, Sports

Field hockey ready to begin easier half of schedule

When the No. 11 Boston University field hockey team takes on the University of Vermont Friday, it will be taking its first tangible steps toward defending the America East title that it earned in 2009. As non-conference play comes to a close, the Terriers will be looking to use the experience they gained against some tough NCAA opponents to best the rest of AE.

The Terriers' (6-3) success this season has earned them the 11th spot on the Kookaburra/NFHCA Division I Poll and, more importantly, the eighth spot on the recently published RPI standings. Both placements are the highest given to any team in AE and make BU the team to beat in the conference.

<strong>Roller Coaster of a Season</strong>

BU has arrived here after a series of ups and downs. The Terriers opened the season with five straight wins, the best start in team history, and were still enjoying the celebration that came with their fifth win when a 1-0 shutout loss to Northeastern University brought them back down to Earth.

As good as the Terriers looked shutting out then-No. 7 Boston College 2-0, they simply couldn't find the back of the net against the Huskies two days later, when they lost their first game of the season despite outshooting their opponent 23-4.

That game seemed to develop a theme that has stuck with the Terriers ever since. In each of their last four games, BU has outshot its opponents but has only come away with one win. A drought in scoring led to two one-goal losses, including the loss to NU, and a 6-1 clobbering at the hands of then-No. 5 Michigan State University.

Having scored three goals in their last four games, the Terriers will look to jump-start their offense in conference games. The fact that the Terriers are dominating games, as far as shots and forced penalty corners go, by a greater margin in their last four games than in their first five is a positive.

If the Terriers can continue to pound the opposition's defense with shots and make good offensive decisions, they are bound to quench their thirst for goals in future games.

<strong>Strength of schedule</strong>

The caliber of the teams BU has faced so far this year is immense. So far, the Terriers' opposition has a combined .584 winning percentage.

Even teams like No. 20 Old Dominion University, whose 4-6 record looks rather pedestrian, have not been pushovers. In fact, the Terriers lost their most recent contest to ODU, 1-0. Beneath the surface, the Monarchs are one of the most decorated teams in NCAA field hockey history, and the fact that all of their games have been against top-20 ranked foes makes their record a moot point.

It is clear that the Terriers' opponents so far have been some of the best in the sport, but why did BU take the hard route instead of simply decorating their non-conference slate with pushovers?

The answer is that it is always easier to go from stiff competition to less stiff competition. The experience that the Terriers have gained in facing top teams will be invaluable now that conference games are beginning.

Fairfield University, another member of AE, has played non-conference opponents so far with a combined winning percentage of .304. They will have a much harder time adjusting to more difficult competition in AE games than the Terriers will.

<strong>Save percentage can be deceiving</strong>

The Terriers' defense is one of the best in the conference. Their posted goals-against average of 1.22 is first in the conference. However, one statistic can be misleading on the defensive end of things &amp;- save percentage.

Senior and sophomore goalies Amanda Smith and Julie Collins have split time between the posts for the Terriers this season, with Smith getting the occasional full game in net. It may seem a bit surprising that Smith bottoms out the AE ranking for save percentage with a .632 mark. However, it is important to remember that much of the defensive credit for a team needs to be given to its defenders in the field.

Looking further into the statistics reveals that Smith has only 12 saves on the year while allowing seven goals. The rest of the starting goalies have many more saves than her.

This is a result of a good defense standing in front of Smith. In most cases, the only shots to get through to her all year have been shots that have gotten by an already stellar back line. Those shots are much harder to save, and although Smith has saved 12 of them, seven have gone for goals. Therefore, Smith remains one of the top goalies in the conference because she has seen fewer, harder shots than almost anyone else, while still maintaining the lowest team GAA.</p>
Website | More Articles

This is an account occasionally used by the Daily Free Press editors to post archived posts from previous iterations of the site or otherwise for special circumstance publications. See authorship info on the byline at the top of the page.

One Comment

  1. I will give you the rule straight from the book. Don’t want to read? Here’s a sumramy.Guys are allowed to fight, and will receive a 5 minute penalty (no suspension). One-on-one only, if a third guy comes into the fight, he is ejected from the game. If one guy started the fight, then he gets a 2 minute instigator penalty. If one guy keeps fighting when the other guy is obviously down and out, he gets an aggressor’ penalty, which is a game misconduct.Rule 47 Fighting47.1 Fighting – A fight shall be deemed to have occurred when at leastone player (or goalkeeper) punches or attempts to punch an opponentrepeatedly or when two players wrestle in such a manner as to makeit difficult for the Linesmen to intervene and separate the combatants.The Referees are provided very wide latitude in the penalties withwhich they may impose under this rule. This is done intentionally toenable them to differentiate between the obvious degrees ofresponsibility of the participants either for starting the fighting orpersisting in continuing the fighting. The discretion provided should beexercised realistically.47.2 Aggressor – The aggressor in an altercation shall be the player (orgoalkeeper) who continues to throw punches in an attempt to inflictpunishment on his opponent who is in a defenseless position or whois an unwilling combatant.A player (or goalkeeper) must be deemed the aggressor when hehas clearly won the fight but he continues throwing and landingpunches in a further attempt to inflict punishment and/or injury on hisopponent who is no longer in a position to defend himself.A player or goalkeeper who is deemed to be the aggressor of analtercation shall be assessed a major penalty for fighting and a gamemisconduct.A player or goalkeeper who is deemed to be the aggressor of analtercation will have this recorded as an aggressor of an altercation forstatistical and suspension purposes.A player or goalkeeper who is deemed to be both the instigatorand aggressor of an altercation shall be assessed an instigating minorpenalty, a major penalty for fighting, a ten-minute misconduct(instigator) and a game misconduct penalty (aggressor).47.3 Altercation An altercation is a situation involving two players(including goalkeepers), with at least one to be penalized.47.4 Clearing the Area of a Fight When a fight occurs, all players notengaged shall go immediately to the area of their players’ bench andin the event the altercation takes place at a players’ bench, theplayers on the ice from that team shall go to their defending zone.Goalkeepers shall remain in their goal crease, except in the event thealtercation takes place in the vicinity of the goal crease, and thereforeshall obey the directions of the Referee. Failure to comply can resultin penalties incurred for their involvement in and around the area andfines as outlined in 47.18.47.5 Continuing or Attempting to Continue a Fight Any player orgoalkeeper who persists in continuing or attempting to continue a fightor altercation after he has been ordered by the Referee to stop, orwho resists a Linesman in the discharge of his duties shall, at thediscretion of the Referee, incur a misconduct or game misconductpenalty in addition to any penalties imposed.47.6 Face Protection If a player penalized as an instigator of analtercation is wearing a face shield (including a goalkeeper), he shallbe assessed an additional unsportsmanlike conduct penalty.Should the player (including a goalkeeper) who instigates the fightbe wearing a face shield, but removes it before instigating thealtercation, the additional unsportsmanlike conduct penalty shall notapply.That’s not even the whole rule, see rule 47 in the link