Editorial, Opinion

STAFF EDIT: Heating up?

The issue of climate change is one that has divided people along and within national borders. The U.S. in particular has come under some international criticism, notably with regard to the Kyoto Protocol and the lack of American support. Nevertheless, it can be argued that other countries are equally guilty of neglect regarding environmentally friendly policy. Regardless, an article published by Bloomberg yesterday shows that this attitude might be changing. The Environmental Protection Agency announced its first cap on greenhouse gas emissions from power plants.

Initially, this seems like a promising step in the right direction. Yet the fine print of the legislation indicates otherwise. This cap, which states plants cannot emit more than 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour, will only apply to new plants that are compliant with modern standards. There is no plan to enforce any kind of legislation on existing plants, many of which are probably antiquated and contribute most to the emission issue. To make matters worse, 15 plants with pending permits before construction can ensue are also excluded from this new rule. So the EPA essentially intends to enforce a ban on only a select portion of plants. A potential breakthrough in instigating meaningful plans to combat global warming has been reduced to a promise that neglects two of the most important groups: power plants that have been polluting and those that intend to do the same in the future.

Whether this will be a step toward more decisive legislation is uncertain. In reality, this plan will probably receive some public recognition before being regarded as useless. Of course, part of the reason the environmental agenda has been slow is due to other issues superseding it. Global warming is not immediately affecting us, but a dismal economic outlook and poverty’s ramifications are evident. The government prioritizes based on what citizens want and what will make the government popular with its people. Unfortunately, until climate change surpasses other domestic and foreign issues America faces, we probably can’t expect meaningful change from anyone except civilians who feel strongly about the issue at hand.

 

Website | More Articles

This is an account occasionally used by the Daily Free Press editors to post archived posts from previous iterations of the site or otherwise for special circumstance publications. See authorship info on the byline at the top of the page.

One Comment

  1. Sad that your education and a major university has not taught you to question what you read. The real data about global warming was manipulated. Even the proponents are not calling it global warming anymore, just climate change. The know the data was bogus. Of course the climate is changing. Just look at the history of the planet and one can see that is is always changing. I would think your education would have taught you critical fact finding and thinking, not just repeating what a few are proposing.

    As for the original evidence of humans being responsible for climate change…. just look up the profession of the person who invented the hockey stick theory…. not a scientist.