Massachusetts ranked fifth for solar energy installations in 2014 and has the sixth highest solar capacity in the nation, a Thursday report by the Environment Massachusetts Research and Policy Center found.
The report focused on the installation of solar energy infrastructure, showing that Massachusetts is one of 10 states experiencing the benefits of that energy. Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina and Vermont are the other top states.
“With the cost of solar energy declining rapidly, tens of thousands more Americans each year are experiencing the benefits of clean energy from the sun, including energy generated right on the rooftops of their homes or places of business,” the report stated.
In order to continue success in using solar power, residents must also consider subscribing to Nexamp solar farm, which will result in cleaner air, reduced emissions and more local jobs, according to the report.
Nathan Phillips, a professor of earth and environment at Boston University’s College of Arts and Sciences, said the rankings are not surprising.
“Massachusetts has had such progressive policies to incentivize solar, so on that level it doesn’t surprise me,” he said. “What does surprise and inspire me is that it used to be that people said, well unless you live in a place like Arizona or California where it’s very sunny, it doesn’t make sense to hugely invest in solar. Now Germany has proved that wrong and Massachusetts has proved that wrong as well.”
Phillips warned of power companies’ potential hesitation to let consumers pursue “energy independence,” which is the ability to generate one’s own electricity.
“The fundamental problem there or issue there is that if you’re generating electricity on your rooftop, the utility is not selling you as much electricity,” Phillips said. “It’s essentially not getting revenue from selling you electricity, so from a utility grid [or] utility company point of view, that’s lost customers. The more that solar rolls out, the less they can sell.”
Utility companies do not want energy independence, but rather to continue to seek ownership over energy and continue to sell it to consumers, Phillips said.
Robert Kaufmann, also a BU professor of earth and environment, said Massachusetts could have avoided implementation policies through taxing.
“It’s just easier to bribe people with tax credits to get them to do what you want than to punish them with tax increases to try to get them to stop what you want them to stop doing,” he said.
Several residents said large scale solar energy use is important in an innovative state such as Massachusetts.
Will Evans, 56, of South Boston, was surprised about the ranking.
“I know Massachusetts is pretty good about stuff like that, but I just had no idea that we were in the top 10. That’s great,” he said. “The only thing is we’re a fairly advanced state so if all other states could follow our pattern, our country would be in a much better place.”
Lemuel Ivy, 30, of Back Bay, said affordability could help other states meet the Massachusetts’s ranking.
“I expected more states to be ahead of us. I mean it’s impressive though,” she said. “If we could just find a way to make solar energy cheaper, other states would be able to catch up with us.”
Ashley Thomas, 36, of Brighton, said she thinks that solar energy is good for both the state and country.
“That makes sense to me,” she said. “People in Massachusetts really understand that solar energy is something important and something that we should all be paying attention to. Good for Massachusetts.”
