All in all, I like where Democratic leadership is going. But, that hopefulness must be ruined. Because while strategists are making good decisions at the top, the people at the bottom have been nothing short of insufferable.
We are constantly fed information through the internet and on social media. Without knowing if the information is true, we spread rumors like wildfires based on assumptions.
After President Donald Trump signed multiple executive orders following his inauguration, people took to social media to share their concerns and hopes for change. Some called for revolution. Some were just hoping to see a boost in their likes.
We measure our worth in grades we receive and the deadlines we meet, but never in the amount of time we take for ourselves. Our hard work comes with the price of neglecting our emotional needs.
Attempts at progress seem more like self-serving symbolic recognition rather than an actual understanding of contemporary cultural conversation. Maybe that’s why “Challengers” was snubbed — it found larger recognition amongst those younger crowds, people whose opinion the Academy may not want to be aligned with.
Passport Bros often lack awareness of the damage they cause, which can echo neocolonialism — the indirect control of developing countries by colonial nations.
In fashion, age almost always proves to be more than a number— it becomes a rule book with rigid restrictions based on the ever-changing definition of appropriate.
Enthusiasts should certainly share their critiques, but when leaks are framed as gaming “news,” fans often blame the company instead of those spreading classified information.
Thus, I absolutely reject any fence-sitters. Any sentiment at all that both parties are equally bad, or that neither represents any of American constituents’ interests is a blatant disregard for the country’s problems. It’s entirely founded upon a position of privilege, expecting some miraculous force to solve all sufferings.
We can’t expect to battle climate change when we don’t even have a decent way of talking about it. Something needs to give — we need to think about restructuring these events to make more headway.
I can only imagine that if the roles were reversed — and this were an Emma Stone look-alike contest — it would be incredibly harmful to women. The contest would be degrading rather than funny, as attendees judge the women who showed up on their bodies and faces. Holding women to old beauty standards once again, it would be a regression of the progress we’ve made.
What if, as a consequence of Vance’s enforcement of open-sourcing model weights, the People’s Liberation Army had open access to the weights of frontier American models? The implications might be detrimental, and here’s why.
